Hospitality Business Plan Competition rules & guidelines

Summary

Through the generous gifts of our donors, the Leland C. and Mary M. Pillsbury Institute for Hospitality Entrepreneurship at the Nolan School of Hotel Administration is pleased to offer an annual business plan competition – the Cornell Hospitality Business Plan Competition. The competition’s primary purpose is to provide an experiential and reflective learning opportunity to rising hospitality entrepreneurs. The competition begins at the start of the academic year with the formation of student teams and the development of a pitch video. As the academic year progresses, so does the competition. The field of teams is narrowed down to the top 10 semi-final teams in late Fall. The competition culminates in the early spring with the submission of final business plans and group presentations during the annual Hotel Ezra Cornell event. Our benefactors’ generous gifts and the funds accumulated from sponsorships within the industry allows the Pillsbury Institute to award the winning team a prize of $25,000, second place team a prize of $7,500, and third place team a prize of $5,000.

The term ” hospitality business,” for the purpose of this competition, is broadly construed and includes businesses providing support services to the hospitality industry (e.g., businesses such as Micros Systems that provide software and hardware to restaurant and lodging businesses). It is critical that teams clearly state the relationship between their business and the hospitality industry. Students who are unsure about the relevance of their business concept to hospitality are highly recommended to consult with the event organizers make sure the concept qualifies as hospitality prior to submitting the pitch video.

Team information

Hospitality Business Plan competition guidelines

Judges & judging criteria

Judges for the first two rounds of the competition will be drawn from Cornell University alumni, faculty, and investment professionals. The panel of judges for the final presentation round will be comprised of individuals with experience in venture capital, private equity investing, and entrepreneurs.

Judges will score the teams’ deliverables using their judgment with respect to specific competition criteria, as summarized below. The teams receiving the highest collective scores on the pitch video advance to the semi-final round and the teams receiving the highest collective scores on the full business plan will advance to the final round. The winner of the competition will be determined by the final presentation judges’ ranking of the teams.

These rankings will be based on the judges’ assessment of both the full business plan and the final presentation. The competition is intended to simulate the real-world process of entrepreneurs soliciting start-up funds from early-stage investors and venture capitalists. Thus, the winning team will be the one whose plan and presentation convey the most promising combination of significant value creation, attractive returns, and execution feasibility.

Competition criteria that the judges will consider in their assessments include but are not limited to:

  1. Clarity, completeness, and persuasiveness of the written business plan and/or oral presentation
  2. The market opportunity presented by the proposed venture (is there a clear market need presented as well as a way to take advantage of that need)
  3. The feasibility, uniqueness and quality of the business plan concept (is the product, technology or service feasible and does it provide something novel that gives it a competitive advantage in the market)
  4. The feasibility and quality of the business model, including the financial projections provided
  5. The financial and/or social return of the proposed venture (the business represents a real investment opportunity in which they would invest in)
  6. The capacity and strength of the management team (experience and expertise)
  7. In the final presentation round, the quality of the team members’ responses to questions from the judges

The decisions of the judges in each round of the competition are final. If no submissions are deemed worthy, no financial awards will be made.

Advisor guidelines

Advisors are available to teams through the Pillsbury Institute’s Entrepreneur in Residence program and our list of expert professionals. Teams must provide all advisors with the competition’s advisor guidelines (i.e., the “Do’s and Don’ts”).

Thank you to our sponsors

We extend our gratitude to our generous sponsors, without whom the Hospitality Business Plan Competition would not be made possible through their generous support.

  • Sandy Solmon, P ’15, Sweet Street Desserts
  • Robert Alter ’73
  • Stanley Sun ’00
  • Edward Hurowitz ’19
  • Elizabeth Shingleton Glomsrud ’00 & Barbara Foote Shingleton ’75